Managed AI Operations

We run it after go-live, and you can take it back whenever you want

Monitoring, on-call, model lifecycle, cost attribution and recovery for AI in production — against an SLA, with no exit fee.

  • 24/7 on-call, five countries
  • 99.9% availability target
  • No exit fee, no lock-in
  1. 01 Quality Live traffic scored against the release set
  2. 02 Model and prompt Eval gates, canary, rollback in minutes
  3. 03 Cost and capacity Per-workload attribution, unit economics
  4. 04 Incident response Severity matrix, paging, post-incident review
  5. 05 Availability The layer every managed service already sells
Availability is the bottom layer. The layers above it are where AI systems actually fail.

The service

Availability is the easy half. Quality is the service.

We monitor whether the system is right, not only whether it is responding. Live traffic is sampled and scored against the evaluation set used at release, inputs are watched for drift, and alerts fire on the gap between expected and observed quality.

  • Quality regression alerts, not just latency and errors
  • Model and prompt changes pass evaluation gates
  • Every call attributed to a workload and a unit cost

Availability

99.9%

Standard-tier target, measured on responses inside the latency objective

Response

15 min

Severity-one acknowledgement on the 24/7 tier, with an engineer engaged

Lifecycle

Models change under you

Suppliers deprecate versions and change behaviour within one version name. We test candidates against your evaluation set first and release by canary, with rollback in minutes.

  • version pinning
  • canary
  • eval gates
  • fast rollback

Cost

Spend with an owner attached

Tokens and GPU-hours tagged by workload and model, reported as cost per resolution or document. What we find is routine: prompts that grew, retries never bounded, oversized models.

  • per-workload tags
  • unit economics
  • cache hit rate
  • budget alerts

Resilience

Recovery for what is not a database

Vector indexes need a measured rebuild time, adapters need lineage, configuration needs point-in-time recovery, and a provider outage should degrade to a fallback, not go down.

  • index rebuild
  • adapter restore
  • config PITR
  • restore drills

Observability

  • OpenTelemetry
  • Prometheus
  • Grafana
  • Loki
  • Langfuse

Incident management

  • PagerDuty
  • Opsgenie
  • ServiceNow
  • status page

Evaluation

  • golden sets
  • LLM-as-judge
  • Ragas
  • promptfoo
  • live sampling

Delivery

  • Argo CD
  • Terraform
  • Helm
  • MLflow

Security and resilience

  • Trivy
  • Vault
  • index snapshots
  • provider failover
  • restore drills

Who we do this for

  • Enterprises running AI in production
  • Government and public sector
  • Financial services and insurance
  • Healthcare and regulated operators
  • Scale-ups without a platform team

Three ways in. Stop after any of them.

2–3 weeks

Operational readiness review

An assessment of monitoring gaps, evaluation coverage, cost attribution, recovery posture and on-call maturity.

Gap analysis, prioritised remediation plan, draft severity matrix

12 months, rolling

Managed service

We take the pager on an agreed tier, covering incidents, model lifecycle, patching and continuous evaluation.

Service definition, monitoring in your accounts, monthly operations report

Ongoing, with an end date

Managed service with handover

The same service, run with an explicit plan to give it back: shadow on-call, then primary, on a date you set.

Runbooks, architecture documentation, incident history, training record

Questions

Yes, and the service assumes you might. Everything runs in your accounts, with code, prompts, evaluation sets, runbooks and incident history in your repositories from day one. No proprietary agent, no exit fee. Your engineers join the rota, take shadow on-call, then primary, and we step down on a date you choose.

If you already have a capable platform team with an on-call rota and an observability practice, buy the readiness review instead, fix the AI-specific gaps and run it yourself. It is also wrong for a low-volume internal tool where an hour of downtime costs nothing — the overhead exceeds the risk it removes.

Three layers. Live traffic is sampled and scored against the golden set used at release, so a regression moves against a known baseline. Input distributions are watched for drift, because the questions shift before the answers get worse. Escalation, refusal and retry rates act as leading indicators.

Talk to someone who has built this

Send us the constraint you are actually up against — budget, latency, regulator, deadline.